Q: Content is accurate, error-free and unbiased

So much of the text is a broad set-up of key issues centred around case studies and narrative examples. This is more a critique of comprehensiveness than it is accuracy, as the material is true, error-free, and accurate, but holding so much of the text together on anecdotal examples and case studies means that there is bound to be a bias, given the simple fact of selection.

"Women in the World" has a clear bias toward parts of the world where US intervention has made a marked difference and the examples and case studies tend to be women from non-democratic states. Had the US turned the text back to reflect on American society, the text could have been even more instructive. Instructors will have to go elsewhere to get illustrations of women in a Western context.

Content Accuracy Rating: 4 out of 5

Q: Content is up-to-date, but not in a way that will quickly make the text obsolete within a short period of time. The text is written and/or arranged in such a way that necessary updates will be relatively easy and straightforward to implement

The text is a broad review of gender issues largely in the developing world--the case studies are largely anecdotal and reflective. Hilary Clinton may no longer be Secretary of State as she was when she authored she introduction, but the sentiments are introductory in nature and allow the text to serve as a useful foundation to issues of women's rights in a global context.

Relevance Rating: 5 out of 5

Q: The text is written in lucid, accessible prose, and provides adequate context for any jargon/technical terminology used

This is first and foremost not a highly technical piece--it was likely made with multiple audiences in mind--and so the result is a text that is concise, clear, and jargon-free.

Clarity Rating: 5 out of 5

Q: The text is internally consistent in terms of terminology and framework

The text is very concise--more of a pamphlet really--but it does have a clear organizational framework. Each chapter is essentially a short summary and review alongside a profile of female leader and a project making a difference on this particular facet. In this way, readers are set up first to understand the issue, meet a persevering woman working to remedy challenges on behalf of women, and then to learn of a particular project--usually USAID-funded--that is working to advance women's rights--making cities safe for women, averting child marriage. The overviews are broad and survey-based, while the profiles and project case studies are investigate these issues in a particular part of the world.

Consistency Rating: 5 out of 5

Q: The text is easily and readily divisible into smaller reading sections that can be assigned at different points within the course (i.e., enormous blocks of text without subheadings should be avoided). The text should not be overly self-referential, and should be easily reorganized and realigned with various subunits of a course without presenting much disruption to the reader.

Given the consistency of the text and the breadth of the text, it would be very easy to break the text in to smaller sections. Since the text is so brief in its entirety, instructors might be best served to find a particular module or chapter of interest to their teaching rather than trying to use the full text from cover to cover. Each individual chapter would fit well in to a larger syllabus and reading assignment.

Modularity Rating: 5 out of 5

Q: The topics in the text are presented in a logical, clear fashion

Yes. Each chapter features and overview, a profile, and a case study. It's all very logical. That said, the text is very focused on 'rights' without being specific or clear about what rights are or how they function. Again, pulling material out of the text and complementing it with material on rights would be useful.

Organization Rating: 4 out of 5

Q: The text is free of significant interface issues, including navigation problems, distortion of images/charts, and any other display features that may distract or confuse the reader

The text can be read from the US Department of State website, with a lot of back and forward clicking for a short text. The full pdf download is more readable, particularly when trying to reference the associated profiles and case studies.

Interface Rating: 3 out of 5

Q: The text contains no grammatical errors

There were no grammatical errors that I could find.

Grammar Rating: 5 out of 5

Q: The text is not culturally insensitive or offensive in any way. It should make use of examples that are inclusive of a variety of races, ethnicities, and backgrounds

The text is free of any cultural insensitivities.

Cultural Relevance Rating: 5 out of 5

Q: Are there any other comments you would like to make about this book, for example, its appropriateness in a Canadian context or specific updates you think need to be made?

Q: Content is accurate, error-free and unbiased

From a Canadian perspective, it doesn't make sense to foreground the book with Hilary Clinton as she's a controversial figure. There are so many Canadians that would grace the early parts of this book and give readers a context for this nation. Looking south is not a helpful way for Canadians to understand women's issues.

Content Accuracy Rating: 3 out of 5

Q: Content is up-to-date, but not in a way that will quickly make the text obsolete within a short period of time. The text is written and/or arranged in such a way that necessary updates will be relatively easy and straightforward to implement

Under the current pandemic conditions, the UN has stated that women have been taken back decades. So yes, the text is already out of date. The She-cession that we are experiencing all over the globe is one part of this but there are many others. I am leading a study on how to improve women's lives despite COVID-19 so have been thinking about this a great deal.
Given this situation, the textbook will need to updated, particularly for the sad reality of increasing hunger, poverty, violence and underemployment that the lockdowns have brought about.

Relevance Rating: 3 out of 5

Q: The text is written in lucid, accessible prose, and provides adequate context for any jargon/technical terminology used

The text is well written. It is accessible for undergraduates, which is why i've pegged it at a 2nd year text. The way it is written does provide for a wide variety of people to read it. Jargon free!

Clarity Rating: 4 out of 5

Q: The text is internally consistent in terms of terminology and framework

Yes. It is internally consistent

Consistency Rating: 4 out of 5

Q: The text is easily and readily divisible into smaller reading sections that can be assigned at different points within the course (i.e., enormous blocks of text without subheadings should be avoided). The text should not be overly self-referential, and should be easily reorganized and realigned with various subunits of a course without presenting much disruption to the reader.

In terms of dividing up the subject matter that could work well for a Women's Studies course or something like that, the chapters are very well divided. This text could easily be applied to a course in the way that it is designed.

Modularity Rating: 4 out of 5

Q: The topics in the text are presented in a logical, clear fashion

Yes the topics flow logically. As mentioned earlier, they present a very negative view of women's issues and offer little hope for readers.

Organization Rating: 4 out of 5

Q: The text is free of significant interface issues, including navigation problems, distortion of images/charts, and any other display features that may distract or confuse the reader

True. Images are clear. There is no distortion etc.

Interface Rating: 4 out of 5

Q: The text contains no grammatical errors

I was unable to find any such errors

Grammar Rating: 4 out of 5

Q: The text is not culturally insensitive or offensive in any way. It should make use of examples that are inclusive of a variety of races, ethnicities, and backgrounds

It is not offensive. It has moved beyond second wave feminism and embraces some third wave feminist ideas & writers.

Cultural Relevance Rating: 3 out of 5

Q: Are there any other comments you would like to make about this book, for example, its appropriateness in a Canadian context or specific updates you think need to be made?

No. The beginning, with Hilary Clinton, is not appealing in almost any way. Then the rest of the text goes on to present a worldview of women as weak, quite disadvantaged, violated, poor and unable to move up in the world. Even the women and media section starts with the history of exclusion and stereotypes.
While all of these facts are important as background, the text would be strongly improved with the addition of positive examples of women's strengths. In the media section, for example, telling the story of the worldwide movement for media democracy that many women's movements are taking up on social media and online environments would paint a picture of women taking control of their media tools. The book simply doesn't do this, even in the potentially promising section in the Media chapter titled "A New Era of Women's Rights" which covers misogyny, under-representation of women and other such topics. Where is all the exciting work that is being produced by women? There was on a radio show at Vancouver Cooperative Radio called Women Do this Every Day and lots more of these kinds of shows exist. These kinds of shows are all about showcasing women's talent and women's lives in an authentic fashion. Why not highlight such media?